Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a (General questions)

by cedral, Wednesday, September 06, 2006, 21:55 (6444 days ago) @ wodDamir

That doesn't seem like a good idea unless you are saying that the user has already been authenticated against the domain inside wodWebServer before UserAuthenticate is called. I can't just believe them when they tell me they are part of the domain. I have to verify it, either with ntlm challenge/response, in which I will never know their password or with kerberos ticket verification, in which I will never know their password.

Now of course sspi provides an abstracted interface using the negotiate protocol to authenticate at an abstracted level without dealing with the details of the specific system (kerberos/ntlm) used. which is why I asked about it.

locked

3045 views

Complete thread:

looking for a way to provide non-interactive authe - cedral, 2006-09-06, 03:30
- Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodDrazen, 2006-09-06, 08:50
  - Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-06, 17:09
    - Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodDamir, 2006-09-06, 18:32
      - Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-06, 21:55
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodSupport, 2006-09-06, 23:21
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-08, 02:42
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-11, 20:03
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodSupport, 2006-09-11, 20:07
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-12, 20:35
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-20, 23:13
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodSupport, 2006-09-20, 23:25
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodSupport, 2006-09-25, 01:39
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-25, 02:41
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodSupport, 2006-09-25, 08:26
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - cedral, 2006-09-27, 00:03
        Re: looking for a way to provide non-interactive a - wodSupport, 2006-09-27, 01:06

Thank you for the great customer service ... I am really impressed with the wodSSH ActiveX control.

Andrew Ross

Kiwi Enterprises

Brilliant, even works on the mobile phone...

Conrad Leigh

Leaf Wireless

It was no small factor, however, that your support in getting me up and running made me buy from you.

Charles Taylor

InterWeave, Inc.

Count us as a satisfied WeOnlyDo customer. We appreciate your terrific support to get the secure Telnet working properly.

Don Fitzpatrick

InterNetworx Systems

We have recently completed a large 1200+ location project where reliable Telnet and SSH connectivity was required. wodSSH worked flawlessly and allowed our staff to complete our project ontime and within budget.

James Sievers

Harbor Technologies